Date: 19 Mar 2001 10:47:25 -0500 From: Nat Lanza <magus@cs.cmu.edu> To: thomas@cuivre.fr.eu.org Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: SCSI-over-* hacks Message-ID: <uocvgp5squq.fsf@tintagel.pdl.cs.cmu.edu> In-Reply-To: <20010319151134.A89803@melusine.cuivre.fr.eu.org> References: <20010319151134.A89803@melusine.cuivre.fr.eu.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Thomas Quinot <thomas@cuivre.fr.eu.org> writes: > Has anyone implemented/thought of implementing: > - a CAM transport for ATAPI devices; > - a CAM transport for USB scanners; > - the Linux SCSI generic device (/dev/sg*)? FreeBSD already has an equivalent to the SCSI generic device -- take a look at pass(4). The only major feature of sg that's currently missing in pass is asynchronous commands. I have a set of patches that adds that support in, but I've been too busy recently with changing jobs to clean them up and submit them. As far as ATAPI-over-CAM, there's been some discussion of having ATA become part of CAM, but I don't remember what the result of it was. You might want to check the list archives. --nat -- nat lanza -------------------------------------- there are no whole truths; magus@cs.cmu.edu ------------------------------- all truths are half-truths http://www.cs.cmu.edu/~magus/ ------------------ -- alfred north whitehead To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?uocvgp5squq.fsf>