Date: Sat, 31 May 2008 15:49:52 -0400 From: "Philip M. Gollucci" <pgollucci@p6m7g8.com> To: =?ISO-8859-2?Q?=A3ukasz_W=B1sikowski?= <lukasz@wasikowski.net> Cc: apache@freebsd.org Subject: Re: mod_macro proposal Message-ID: <4841ABE0.4040505@p6m7g8.com> In-Reply-To: <001c01c8c16c$a4f09c80$eed1d580$@net>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
Łukasz W±sikowski wrote: > Hello! > > According to http://cri.ensmp.fr/~coelho/mod_macro/#download mod_macro 1.1.6 > (in FreeBSD ports, marked as USE_APACHE=20+) is for apache 2.0, for apache If thats the case, this should say USE_APACHE=20 > 2.2 is mod_macro 1.1.10 (currently not in ports). I'd like to add > www/mod_macro22 to ports tree and actively maintain it. In this case is it a > good idea to make www/mod_macro2 (1.1.6) only for apache 2.0 as stated by > it's author (after adding mod_macro22 to ports)? What are your thoughts in > this topic? www/mod_macro20 -> USE_APACHE=20 www/mod_macro22 -> USE_APACHE=22 www/mod_macro24 -> USE_APACHE=24 Realistically though, the module author really should patch the module to work with both 2.0.x and 2.2.x. The differences should be really minor. -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Philip M. Gollucci (philip@ridecharge.com) o:703.549.2050x206 Senior System Admin - Riderway, Inc. http://riderway.com / http://ridecharge.com 1024D/DB9B8C1C B90B FBC3 A3A1 C71A 8E70 3F8C 75B8 8FFB DB9B 8C1C Work like you don't need the money, love like you'll never get hurt, and dance like nobody's watching.home | help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4841ABE0.4040505>