Date: Sat, 31 May 2008 15:49:52 -0400 From: "Philip M. Gollucci" <pgollucci@p6m7g8.com> To: =?ISO-8859-2?Q?=A3ukasz_W=B1sikowski?= <lukasz@wasikowski.net> Cc: apache@freebsd.org Subject: Re: mod_macro proposal Message-ID: <4841ABE0.4040505@p6m7g8.com> In-Reply-To: <001c01c8c16c$a4f09c80$eed1d580$@net> References: <001c01c8c16c$a4f09c80$eed1d580$@net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Łukasz W±sikowski wrote: > Hello! > > According to http://cri.ensmp.fr/~coelho/mod_macro/#download mod_macro 1.1.6 > (in FreeBSD ports, marked as USE_APACHE=20+) is for apache 2.0, for apache If thats the case, this should say USE_APACHE=20 > 2.2 is mod_macro 1.1.10 (currently not in ports). I'd like to add > www/mod_macro22 to ports tree and actively maintain it. In this case is it a > good idea to make www/mod_macro2 (1.1.6) only for apache 2.0 as stated by > it's author (after adding mod_macro22 to ports)? What are your thoughts in > this topic? www/mod_macro20 -> USE_APACHE=20 www/mod_macro22 -> USE_APACHE=22 www/mod_macro24 -> USE_APACHE=24 Realistically though, the module author really should patch the module to work with both 2.0.x and 2.2.x. The differences should be really minor. -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Philip M. Gollucci (philip@ridecharge.com) o:703.549.2050x206 Senior System Admin - Riderway, Inc. http://riderway.com / http://ridecharge.com 1024D/DB9B8C1C B90B FBC3 A3A1 C71A 8E70 3F8C 75B8 8FFB DB9B 8C1C Work like you don't need the money, love like you'll never get hurt, and dance like nobody's watching.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4841ABE0.4040505>