Date: Mon, 08 Sep 2014 15:51:52 +0200 From: Mathieu Arnold <mat@FreeBSD.org> To: Mark Felder <feld@freebsd.org>, Adam Weinberger <adamw@adamw.org>, apache@freebsd.org Subject: Re: apache 2.2 ports Message-ID: <1078D71E80C9283D7F23513F@ogg.in.absolight.net> In-Reply-To: <8c7c200293f6d84e756d6eec4a1edcc2@mail.feld.me> References: <8DF8037F-F9EC-488D-86C4-0923789C174C@adamw.org> <8c7c200293f6d84e756d6eec4a1edcc2@mail.feld.me>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
+--On 8 septembre 2014 13:41:54 +0000 Mark Felder <feld@freebsd.org> wrote: | September 6 2014 10:24 AM, "Adam Weinberger" <adamw@adamw.org> wrote: |> apache team - |> |> So it seems that setting USE_APACHE=22 doesn’t actually depend on |> apache-2.2. This means that every USE_APACHE=22 port is broken, and as |> of right now won’t have any 10.1 packages. |> |> I’m happy to go through and add "DEFAULT_VERSIONS= APACHE=22” to |> this ports, but I wanted to check with you guys first. Is that the right |> way to fix it? Is there something else that can be done to make |> USE_APACHE=22 actually depend on apache-2.2? |> | | FYI I had to solve this problem today with the following two make.conf | options: | | DEFAULT_VERSIONS= apache=2.2 | | (note it's 2.2, not 22 -- bsd.default-versions.mk shows a period should | be used) | | APACHE_PORT= www/apache22 | | | Previously I only had the DEFAULT_VERSIONS entry and it worked fine. | Suddenly I needed to add APACHE_PORT as well. This is with an up to date | ports tree -- my packages build automatically every 8 hours. Yes, bapt sent a patch to fix that <https://people.freebsd.org/~bapt/apache-version.diff>; -- Mathieu Arnold
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1078D71E80C9283D7F23513F>