Date: Fri, 14 May 2021 08:10:55 +0000 From: "Poul-Henning Kamp" <phk@phk.freebsd.dk> To: jake h <jakehfreebsd@gmail.com> Cc: "Rodney W. Grimes" <freebsd-rwg@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net>, current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: HEADSUP: i2c(8) has been washed and ironed Message-ID: <18380.1620979855@critter.freebsd.dk> In-Reply-To: <CAF4CO338-jQippKRzEHHyQf3WRORUAXGWgbt9ASqPJky=%2BqXeA@mail.gmail.com> References: <6070.1620907795@critter.freebsd.dk> <202105131913.14DJDCZa077839@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net> <CAF4CO338-jQippKRzEHHyQf3WRORUAXGWgbt9ASqPJky=%2BqXeA@mail.gmail.com>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
-------- jake h writes: > > What about adding a new flag to enable strtoul behavior? > I have had a look at the available flag options for a potential strtoul > flag, and a flag that makes sense to me is [-s] / [--strtoul]. [-s] is not > currently being used in i2c, if we wanted to use it. -s is already used to select "scan" mode. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.home | help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?18380.1620979855>