Date: Tue, 09 May 2000 16:42:13 -0700 From: Mike Smith <msmith@freebsd.org> To: obrien@freebsd.org Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: One more question (different now) Message-ID: <200005092342.QAA20940@mass.cdrom.com> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 09 May 2000 16:38:28 PDT." <20000509163828.A67002@dragon.nuxi.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> On Tue, May 09, 2000 at 04:27:10PM -0700, Mike Smith wrote: > > The only answer I've seen for this one is to kick, hard, whoever it was > > that added -Wcast-qual to the kernel options. > > Or we should just delete it from the options. Ugh. I don't actually like that, because it serves a valid purpose. What irritates me mostly is just that there is no way of casting a volatile object into a non-volatile type, so you can't implement any sort of conditional volatility exclusion. -- \\ Give a man a fish, and you feed him for a day. \\ Mike Smith \\ Tell him he should learn how to fish himself, \\ msmith@freebsd.org \\ and he'll hate you for a lifetime. \\ msmith@cdrom.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200005092342.QAA20940>