Date: Mon, 7 Dec 2009 12:10:18 +0100 From: Ed Schouten <ed@80386.nl> To: Luigi Rizzo <rizzo@iet.unipi.it> Cc: svn-src-head@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org, Hajimu UMEMOTO <ume@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: svn commit: r200157 - head/bin/date Message-ID: <20091207111018.GF64905@hoeg.nl> In-Reply-To: <20091207085927.GC57764@onelab2.iet.unipi.it> References: <200912052009.nB5K9okL098577@svn.freebsd.org> <ygek4wzpdv3.wl%ume@mahoroba.org> <20091207055752.GD64905@hoeg.nl> <20091207085927.GC57764@onelab2.iet.unipi.it>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--YxcAuBb71PAz0ECB Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hello Luigi, * Luigi Rizzo <rizzo@iet.unipi.it> wrote: > Any chance to put libulog and other 'extension' libraries together > (I would say into libc but perhaps that's too much). Even though I agree having all these small libraries is not the way to=20 go, I really want to have the ulog functions in a separate library.=20 libulog is meant to be a migration tool towards a real utmpx=20 implementation. It basically implements the subset of utmpx we can support, but with a ulog_-prefix. I don't want to advertise it as being utmpx itself, this would only cause autofoo-based ports to break. By the time we gain proper utmpx support, I want to be able to phase out libulog, or at least move its non-redundant functionality into libutil. I guess libulog will be history by the time we release FreeBSD 10.0. --=20 Ed Schouten <ed@80386.nl> WWW: http://80386.nl/ --YxcAuBb71PAz0ECB Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAksc4poACgkQ52SDGA2eCwUtIwCfSTtxIBcsQelYajInIavebiO1 SGkAnRLPnzgTCVyXGkQ4f63B8BcB4nsi =ABE/ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --YxcAuBb71PAz0ECB--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20091207111018.GF64905>