Date: Wed, 20 Dec 1995 07:14:32 -0800 From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com> To: davidg@Root.COM Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: conf.c and USL copyright at top Message-ID: <1393.819472472@time.cdrom.com> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 20 Dec 1995 07:08:30 PST." <199512201508.HAA00180@corbin.Root.COM>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Are you sure it's genuinely _going away_ or is it just going to become a repository for miscellaneous stub declarations? Jordan > >OK, so it was a mistake to add code to encumbered files. No argument > >from anybody on that point, I'm pretty sure. However, do we just > >throw up our hands in defeat? I surely hope not! Your analysis below > >would certainly suggest to me that removing the USL copyright is now > >an option we can realistically entertain. It's not even remotely > >"derived" from now. In our CVS tree, we're no worse off than before. > >In our exported tree, it's one less encumbered file, right? > > conf.c will be going away in the near future, anyway, so why is this an > issue? > > -DG
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1393.819472472>