Date: Wed, 10 Mar 1999 02:58:06 -0800 (PST) From: asami@FreeBSD.org (Satoshi Asami) To: dirk@FreeBSD.org Cc: cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/Mk bsd.port.mk Message-ID: <199903101058.CAA93238@silvia.hip.berkeley.edu> In-Reply-To: <19990310115306.A43595@physik.TU-Berlin.DE> (message from Dirk Froemberg on Wed, 10 Mar 1999 11:53:06 %2B0100) References: <199903091127.DAA22246@freefall.freebsd.org> <19990309234904.A35636@physik.TU-Berlin.DE> <199903092252.OAA91301@silvia.hip.berkeley.edu> <19990310115306.A43595@physik.TU-Berlin.DE>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
* From: Dirk Froemberg <dirk@FreeBSD.org>
* On Tue, Mar 09, 1999 at 02:52:57PM -0800, Satoshi Asami wrote:
* > People need to get the upgrade kits if they want to use ports-current
* > for anything other than the latest -current or -stable. If there is
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
* > some documentation that suggests otherwise, please fix that.
* At the moment there is no way to distinguish between 3.1-RELEASE and
* 3.1-STABLE via __FreeBSD_version. But we have to, since fetch behaves
* differently.
No, ports-current is NOT supposed to work for 3.1R. (3.1R != "latest
-current | -stable")
Satoshi
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199903101058.CAA93238>