Date: Sat, 1 Oct 2005 12:17:16 -0400 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> To: Bj?rn K?nig <bkoenig@cs.tu-berlin.de> Cc: Freddie Cash <fcash-ml@sd73.bc.ca>, freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Which MySQL version best to use and with/without linux threads? Message-ID: <20051001161716.GB67272@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <433E9DD1.90900@cs.tu-berlin.de> References: <ED4C536E-48C1-11D9-B2C4-000A2791B6EC@illusionart.com> <1102494183.41b6b9e726b2f@www.domainfactory-webmail.de> <433D3C12.6020104@axis.nl> <200509300925.38171.fcash-ml@sd73.bc.ca> <433E9DD1.90900@cs.tu-berlin.de>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
[-- Attachment #1 --] On Sat, Oct 01, 2005 at 04:31:45PM +0200, Bj?rn K?nig wrote: > Freddie Cash wrote: > > >Scott Long and Kris Kenneway ran various benchmarks back in the early > >5.x days comparing MySQL 4 compiled with LinuxThreads, libc_r, libkse > >(the default threading library on 5.x and 6.x), and libthr. In almost > >all cases, libkse was just as faster or faster than LinuxThreads. > > Do you have a reference? I couldn't reproduce this conclusion. I suspect it was Robert Watson, not me (or my strangely-named cousin :-). Kris [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFDPraMWry0BWjoQKURAhhBAKCEJslSf50dBEM5tlzo9P0mMRdVpwCgqhdt 6VLz3A+JvwyW7ndE9rfVsSM= =PABS -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----home | help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20051001161716.GB67272>