Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2002 16:07:58 -0600 From: Brett Glass <brett@lariat.org> To: Igor Roshchin <str@giganda.komkon.org> Cc: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Apache 1.3.26 port Message-ID: <4.3.2.7.2.20020619160330.023789f0@localhost> In-Reply-To: <200206192156.g5JLukI21451@giganda.komkon.org> References: <4.3.2.7.2.20020619153117.0230db10@localhost>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
At 03:56 PM 6/19/2002, Igor Roshchin wrote: >Brett, > >It's nice that you have so much energy to write so much e-mails >to the mailing list. >However, if you have so much time resources on you hand, why wouldn't you >take a quick look in the files/patch-?? files ? >If you did that, you'd see that one of the patches (patch-ab) >introduces that. Why would it need to be introduced if it was already in Apache? >(see the excerpt from the patch file below). >This way you would've saved your time, other people's time, >and bandwidth, and produce produce a more useful result. It wouldn't have changed the usefulness of what I said. Data is deleted, period. True, it's done via the symlink "data.default", but the result is the same as if /usr/local/www/data were nuked directly. >The author of the patch (sorry, don't have time to look into the cvs tree >now) If you didn't have time to look into the CVS tree, why are you making a big deal about the fact that I didn't do so... especially since what was wrong was already clear? --Brett To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4.3.2.7.2.20020619160330.023789f0>