Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2011 11:30:19 -0600 From: Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com> To: Ryan Stone <rysto32@gmail.com> Cc: toolchain@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: ARM issue with old binutils Message-ID: <BB2C3056-2BE3-4953-ABD0-7634F4E3B875@bsdimp.com> In-Reply-To: <BANLkTi=qLKicHg6ZhWqR3sNpKO2PUEJ8Zg@mail.gmail.com> References: <0C35FE0F-3301-44C6-AC40-233F6C446EBC@gmail.com> <744CFC2C-0F17-4AED-A54A-FC93EB885FAD@bsdimp.com> <BANLkTi=qLKicHg6ZhWqR3sNpKO2PUEJ8Zg@mail.gmail.com>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
On Jun 22, 2011, at 10:42 AM, Ryan Stone wrote: > On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 11:39 AM, Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com> wrote: >> I'd be inclined to include a small patch to FreeBSD's binutils to implement this. You might be able to snag it from a newer version of binutils if you can track down the author of that code and ask if you can include it in a GPLv2 version of binutils. > > Wouldn't the FSF be the copyright owner? I thought that they required > copyright assignment for contributions? Not necessarily. Only large things need to be assigned. Simple patches not so much... Warnerhome | help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?BB2C3056-2BE3-4953-ABD0-7634F4E3B875>