Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2000 22:39:05 +0200 From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.freebsd.dk> To: Brian Somers <brian@Awfulhak.org> Cc: "Matthew N. Dodd" <winter@jurai.net>, Terry Lambert <tlambert@primenet.com>, arch@FreeBSD.ORG, brian@hak.lan.awfulhak.org Subject: Re: Software detection of link integrity Message-ID: <55786.961533545@critter.freebsd.dk> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 20 Jun 2000 21:24:25 BST." <200006202024.VAA66394@hak.lan.Awfulhak.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <200006202024.VAA66394@hak.lan.Awfulhak.org>, Brian Somers writes: >> I did this entirely for sppp, but it applies fully to any other >> interface: an ethernet should remain configured but remove the >> routes if the cable is unplugged. > >No, I think the aim here is to keep the routes but to adjust them so >that they're via an interface rather than an IP number, something >like: We should not keep an route to a net which is down, that is just wrong, and defeats the pupose of routing daemons like gated/zebra etc. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD coreteam member | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?55786.961533545>