Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2001 18:21:01 +0100 From: j mckitrick <jcm@FreeBSD-uk.eu.org> To: John Merryweather Cooper <jmcoopr@webmail.bmi.net> Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: question about wc on for NON-critical workstation (no flamebait) Message-ID: <20010724182101.A71800@dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org> In-Reply-To: <20010724101241.K1487@johncoop>; from jmcoopr@webmail.bmi.net on Tue, Jul 24, 2001 at 10:12:41AM -0700 References: <20010724180907.A71575@dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org> <20010724101241.K1487@johncoop>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Jul 24, 2001 at 10:12:41AM -0700, John Merryweather Cooper wrote: | On 2001.07.24 10:09 j mckitrick wrote: | > | > For day to day use (programming, netscape, email, etc) will wc on show | > any | > performance improvement? | > | > jcm | > -- | > o-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-o | > | ~~~~~~~~~~~~ Jonathon McKitrick ~~~~~~~~~~~~~ | | > | "I prefer the term 'Artificial Person' myself." | | > o-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-o | > | > | > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org | > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message | > | | Try it . . . the answer is yes . . . and like everything else | in life (especially entities that are "built for speed"), it's | a calculated risk. I figure I have a battery pack anyway for the laptop, but I wondered if such a light load would benefit from write-caching anyway, with softupdates running as well. jcm -- o-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-o | ~~~~~~~~~~~~ Jonathon McKitrick ~~~~~~~~~~~~~ | | "I prefer the term 'Artificial Person' myself." | o-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-o To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010724182101.A71800>