Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2002 00:28:02 +0200 From: "Patrick O'Reilly" <bsd@perimeter.co.za> To: m p <sumirati@yahoo.de>, John Mills <john.m.mills@alum.mit.edu>, FreeBSD-questions <freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: S/Key - this is embarrasing. Message-ID: <200204140023.47428@.perimeter.co.za> In-Reply-To: <20020413190545.5041.qmail@web13306.mail.yahoo.com> References: <20020413190545.5041.qmail@web13306.mail.yahoo.com>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
On Sat 13 Apr 02 21:05, m p wrote:
> Hi John,
>
> I wanted to correct a statement with that question. It was: "no other
> unices were using files with process ids". They are doing it - but in
> the rc.d scripts (it is hidden from the user).
>
Marc,
I am aware that the rc.d script just wrap up the kill to the blood off
the user's fingers :)
When I said "I'm not aware of other Unices that use this convention (
kill SIGHUP /var/run/${procname}.pid )." I was focussing on the
convention of creating a file in /var/run/ which notes the pid in use
by the daemon.
Again, I might well be wrong in that assumption too. :)
--
Regards,
Patrick O'Reilly.
___ _ __
/ _ )__ __ (_)_ __ ___ _/ /____ __
/ __/ -_) _) / ~ ) -_), ,-/ -_) _)
/_/ \__/_//_/_/~/_/\__/ \__/\__/_/
http://www.perimeter.co.za
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
help
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200204140023.47428>