Date: Sun, 7 Mar 2010 20:06:41 +0100 From: Alexander Leidinger <Alexander@Leidinger.net> To: Ed Schouten <ed@80386.nl> Cc: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Subject: Re: linux-only jail possible? Message-ID: <20100307200641.00004369@unknown> In-Reply-To: <20100307104437.GM8200@hoeg.nl> References: <201003021325.27197.lists@jnielsen.net> <20100306073117.GE8200@hoeg.nl> <20100306081238.GF8200@hoeg.nl> <201003061241.59580.lists@jnielsen.net> <20100306181512.GK8200@hoeg.nl> <20100307113538.00007555@unknown> <20100307104437.GM8200@hoeg.nl>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, 7 Mar 2010 11:44:37 +0100 Ed Schouten <ed@80386.nl> wrote: > * Alexander Leidinger <Alexander@Leidinger.net> wrote: > > On Sat, 6 Mar 2010 19:15:12 +0100 Ed Schouten <ed@80386.nl> wrote: > > > > > I am still in doubt what to do. Maybe we could consider > > > committing a patch like this: > > [...] > > > This is a bit more complete. What it does, is that it creates a > > > symlink from /proc/%d/fd to /dev/fd, only if the calling process > > > matches. Then when you mount fdescfs on /dev/fd, it also does the > > > right thing, because it will always readlink() on a character > > > device, which also returns an error code. > > > > > > Comments, suggestions anyone? > > > > Looks better than the one before. :) > > Great. Just committed it to SVN: Note: I didn't test it. I just think it is better than a hack, but we need to change the instructions how to have a full linux env... Bye, Alexander.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20100307200641.00004369>