Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2008 12:17:39 +0100 From: Alexander Leidinger <Alexander@Leidinger.net> To: rick-freebsd@kiwi-computer.com Cc: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org, infofarmer@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: is graphics/linux-cairo broken? Message-ID: <20080103121739.7a4eaf58@deskjail> In-Reply-To: <20080103001759.GA79510@keira.kiwi-computer.com> References: <20080102065713.GA67906@keira.kiwi-computer.com> <20080102143351.0d06cf71@deskjail> <20080103001759.GA79510@keira.kiwi-computer.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Quoting "Rick C. Petty" <rick-freebsd@kiwi-computer.com> (Wed, 2 Jan 2008 18:17:59 -0600): > On Wed, Jan 02, 2008 at 02:33:51PM +0100, Alexander Leidinger wrote: > > Quoting "Rick C. Petty" <rick-freebsd@kiwi-computer.com> (Wed, 2 Jan 2008 00:57:13 -0600): > > > > > My guess is linux-cairo shouldn't be setting USE_LDCONFIG or it should > > > > This is correct, it should use "INSTALLS_SHLIB= yes" instead. > > Shall I file one PR per port that's broken or one total PR? I suggest one PR per maintainer. Note, only for linux ports INSTALLS_SHLIB should be used, for native ports USE_LDCONFIG is right. Alternatively someone could test the USE_LDCONFIG stuff in http://www.leidinger.net/FreeBSD/port-patches/Mk:bsd.port.mk.diff So far I hadn't time to really test it (but as I installed linux-cairo before your bug report and didn't noticed a problem, it may already work...). If someone really tests it and confirms it works, I will send a PR to portmgr to integrate it. Bye, Alexander. -- BOFH excuse #32: techtonic stress http://www.Leidinger.net Alexander @ Leidinger.net: PGP ID = B0063FE7 http://www.FreeBSD.org netchild @ FreeBSD.org : PGP ID = 72077137
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20080103121739.7a4eaf58>