Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2012 13:41:32 -0500 From: Eitan Adler <eadler@freebsd.org> To: Stephen McKay <smckay@internode.on.net> Cc: FreeBSD FS <freebsd-fs@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: ZFS FAQ (Was: SSD recommendations for ZFS cache/log) Message-ID: <CAF6rxgnjPJ=v24p%2BkOci2qGQ1weH7r%2B8vdLmiJ_1DrxLeEzZvg@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <57ac1f$gg70bn@ipmail05.adl6.internode.on.net> References: <CAFHbX1K-NPuAy5tW0N8=sJD=CU0Q1Pm3ZDkVkE%2BdjpCsD1U8_Q@mail.gmail.com> <57ac1f$gf3rkl@ipmail05.adl6.internode.on.net> <50A31D48.3000700@shatow.net> <CAF6rxgkh6C0LKXOZa264yZcA3AvQdw7zVAzWKpytfh0%2BKnLOJg@mail.gmail.com> <57ac1f$gg70bn@ipmail05.adl6.internode.on.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 15 November 2012 23:58, Stephen McKay <smckay@internode.on.net> wrote: > On Thursday, 15th November 2012, Eitan Adler wrote: > >>Can people here please tell me what is wrong in the following content? > > A few things. I'll intersperse them. > >>Is there additional data or questions to add? > > The whole ZFS world desperately needs good documentation. There > are misconceptions everywhere. There are good tuning hints and > bad (or out of date) ones. Further, it depends on your target > application whether the defaults are fairly good or plain suck. New version of the patch taking into account the comments so far: http://people.freebsd.org/~eadler/files/add-zfs-faq-section.diff -- Eitan Adler Source, Ports, Doc committer Bugmeister, Ports Security teams
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAF6rxgnjPJ=v24p%2BkOci2qGQ1weH7r%2B8vdLmiJ_1DrxLeEzZvg>