Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2010 11:55:34 +0100 From: Pete French <petefrench@ticketswitch.com> To: to.my.trociny@gmail.com Cc: pjd@freebsd.org, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: hast vs ggate+gmirror sychrnoisation speed Message-ID: <E1PAKiE-000CdG-C2@dilbert.ticketswitch.com> In-Reply-To: <861v7ii8mg.fsf@kopusha.home.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> You could change the values and recompile hastd :-). It would be interesting > to know about the results of your experiment (if you do). I changed the buffer sizes to the same as I was using for ggate, but the speed is still the same - 44meg/second (about half of what the link can do) interesting... BTW, the speed appears to be fine for my current load so this isn't a probelm for me per-se, just surprised at the difference in re-sync performance. -pete.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?E1PAKiE-000CdG-C2>