Date: Sun, 3 Mar 2019 12:20:40 -0800 From: Enji Cooper <yaneurabeya@gmail.com> To: Steven Hartland <steven@multiplay.co.uk> Cc: Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@freebsd.org>, src-committers@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, svn-src-head@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r344701 - head/sbin/camcontrol Message-ID: <64CCD099-1916-4ACC-B1B6-3F22BDE55C7C@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <f65de4b9-c1a7-3b95-1507-d1ed2d120ed1@freebsd.org> References: <201903011439.x21EdFlH055596@repo.freebsd.org> <20190302104909.GA25217@FreeBSD.org> <f65de4b9-c1a7-3b95-1507-d1ed2d120ed1@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> On Mar 3, 2019, at 11:12, Steven Hartland <steven@multiplay.co.uk> wrote:
>=20
> Not really much more to say that isn't explained by that and the code.
>=20
> Sure I could have used a different sentence structure for the body but it w=
ouldn't add anything IMO, thoughts?
Why the previous sector size was wrong isn=E2=80=99t clear from the comm=
it message. Why switch from a sizeof to 0?
Cheers!
-Enji=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?64CCD099-1916-4ACC-B1B6-3F22BDE55C7C>