Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2012 14:52:24 +0100 From: Damien Fleuriot <ml@my.gd> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Is it worthy upgrading to 9.0 ? Message-ID: <4F4CDC18.8060905@my.gd> In-Reply-To: <20120228131425.GA1676@homey.local> References: <1330390351993-5520494.post@n5.nabble.com> <4F4C8A61.5010605@my.gd> <201202281721.35827.erichfreebsdlist@ovitrap.com> <20120228131425.GA1676@homey.local>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 2/28/12 2:14 PM, Stas Verberkt wrote: > On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 05:21:35PM +0700, Erich Dollansky wrote: >> I cannot tell how often I have said this already. I stay with the even branches until the next even branch comes out. Currently, the machine here runs 8.3 and will stick to 8 until 10.0 or 10.1 will arrive at the scene. >> > Just wondering: is there any difference between an even and an uneven > branch? > > Kind regards, > > Stas Verberkt > To be honest, there shouldn't be. There's an old saying that goes along the lines of "uneven are unstable/experimental" but recent comments on the ML have claimed otherwise.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4F4CDC18.8060905>