Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2015 12:24:25 -0500 From: Jonathon Reinhart <jonathon.reinhart@gmail.com> To: sthaug@nethelp.no, Sean Bruno <sbruno@freebsd.org>, Scott Long <scott4long@yahoo.com> Cc: freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org, freebsd-drivers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ciss(4) HP Smart Array P840 Message-ID: <CAPFHKzdJ3F3ay0FQf0cwMWadSercKdg_tWap-poUeTpMe1Gn-Q@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20151120.084410.74714437.sthaug@nethelp.no> References: <CAPFHKzf65eSsg0aNe5wjS1jUVeh7gd9xgvAvMVuc6Shunsc9GA@mail.gmail.com> <20151120.084410.74714437.sthaug@nethelp.no>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 2:44 AM, <sthaug@nethelp.no> wrote: > This is somewhat interesting to me since I actually have 10.2-STABLE > up and running on a HP DL360 Gen9 server with what appears to be the > same controller: For giggles, I booted up FreeBSD 10.2-STABLE (r290274), and it successfully sees the drives (P840, HBA mode). # camcontrol devlist <ATA ST1000DM003-1ER1 CC46> at scbus1 target 4 lun 0 (pass0, da0) <ATA ST1000DM003-1ER1 CC46> at scbus1 target 5 lun 0 (pass0, da0) ... So I guess this is just a FreeBSD 9.3 vs 10.2 issue, and unfortunately FreeNAS uses the former. I'm still unsure why the difference exists, as it seems like ciss is largely unchanged from 9.3 to 10.2.home | help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAPFHKzdJ3F3ay0FQf0cwMWadSercKdg_tWap-poUeTpMe1Gn-Q>