Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2014 07:00:24 +0000 From: =?utf-8?B?S2FybGkgU2rDtmJlcmc=?= <Karli.Sjoberg@slu.se> To: "zeus@ibs.dn.ua" <zeus@ibs.dn.ua> Cc: "freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.org" <freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: why no automount for one zfs? Message-ID: <5F9E965F5A80BC468BE5F40576769F099DF85D61@exchange2-1> In-Reply-To: <20141104085120.81576@smtp.new-ukraine.org> References: <20141104072923.79140@smtp.new-ukraine.org> <5F9E965F5A80BC468BE5F40576769F099DF85BC1@exchange2-1> <20141104085120.81576@smtp.new-ukraine.org>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
On Tue, 2014-11-04 at 08:51 +0200, Zeus Panchenko wrote: > Karli Sjöberg <Karli.Sjoberg@slu.se> wrote: > > > On Tue, 2014-11-04 at 07:29 +0200, Zeus Panchenko wrote: > > To have ZFS filesystems mounted at boot, first of all, "canmount" must > > be on (check) and then you have need to have: > > thanks, yes it is (and it is mentioned in `zfs get all' output in my > initial post) Indeed, hence they previous "check" comment on my part:) > > > zfs_enable="YES" > > in "rc.conf". Then there´s also the question how the parent filesystems > > "/home/zeus" and "/home" are mounted? Are they also ZFS? > > my case is root-on-zfs, one pool and no other fs except ZFS > > all other fs (ZFS) are mounted correctly > And, just to be sure, they are all mounted automatically the same way? Like if you maybe have some filesystems mounted automatically and some through fstab as "canmount=noauto", or stuff like that? -- Med Vänliga Hälsningar ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Karli Sjöberg Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences Box 7079 (Visiting Address Kronåsvägen 8) S-750 07 Uppsala, Sweden Phone: +46-(0)18-67 15 66 karli.sjoberg@slu.sehelp
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?5F9E965F5A80BC468BE5F40576769F099DF85D61>