Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 31 Mar 2013 14:27:36 +0300
From:      Markiyan Kushnir <markiyan.kushnir@gmail.com>
To:        freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: svn - but smaller?
Message-ID:  <51581DA8.7040106@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <51580AD1.1070704@gmail.com>
References:  <web-11636850@mailback4.g2host.com> <513E2DA5.70200@mac.com> <web-12282796@mailback4.g2host.com> <op.wts7cnaeg7njmm@michael-think> <web-11149903@mailback3.g2host.com> <dd47b0701af3e2b6c92fe70fa0da3fc1.squirrel@webmail.ee.ryerson.ca> <web-11167614@mailback3.g2host.com> <514E7927.2010901@gmail.com> <web-11318704@mailback3.g2host.com> <51580718.1010501@gmail.com> <51580AD1.1070704@gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 31.03.2013 13:07, Markiyan Kushnir wrote:
> Hi John,
>
> I also measured svnup basic process resource usage, attaching a complete
> plot (measurements were taken each 2 seconds based on ps(1) and
> procstat(1)). Hopefully it will help you as well.
>

(in case it's not available through the list)

https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B9Q-zpUXxqCnRVVMTkk1blVfZzA/edit?usp=sharing

--
Markiyan.

> --
> Markiyan.
>
> On 31.03.2013 12:51, Markiyan Kushnir wrote:
>> On 25.03.2013 02:55, John Mehr wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sun, 24 Mar 2013 05:55:19 +0200
>>>   Markiyan Kushnir <markiyan.kushnir@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> Hello John,
>>>>
>>>> Tested svnup for a while, and I can say it does its job well, and
>>>> works basically as I would expect, so thanks for your initiative.
>>>> Although it appears to be quite resource greedy. Most of the time it
>>>> showed something like:
>>>>
>>>>   PID USERNAME    THR PRI NICE   SIZE    RES STATE   C   TIME   WCPU
>>>> COMMAND
>>>> 22270 mkushnir      1 102    0 44944K 31804K CPU0    1   6:22 97.56%
>>>> a.out
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I looked at the source code, and found that it uses svn commands that
>>>> are known as the "main command set". The program is implemented around
>>>> get-dir and get-file. I think there is significant room for resource
>>>> and performance improvement.
>>>>
>>>> Have you considered an approach to use what svn folks call the editor
>>>> command set? I mean acting as a trivial svn client: we might ask the
>>>> server to drive our checking out or updating. The server will be
>>>> telling us only diffs. Checking out a full tree would be just another
>>>> diff, although bigger than usually. We would also benefit from
>>>> compression on the wire.
>>>>
>>>> Another advantage would be to always have consistent repo more-or-less
>>>> guaranteed by the svn server.
>>>>
>>>> I've done some proof of concept recently, and the results look
>>>> encouraging to me. For example, a do-nothing update really does
>>>> nothing. A two-or-three revisions update takes a couple of seconds.
>>>> And a full checkout of the base/stable/9 takes ~7m30s at 530kB/s to me.
>>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> The results I was getting from testing out the svn protocol's editor
>>> command set were unpleasant enough to put it into the "come back to this
>>> later" category while I worked on implementing the http/https side.  The
>>> good news it that the http side is *much* easier to work with in this
>>> respect and getting a report with filenames and MD5/SHA-1 signatures for
>>> all of the files in the repository can be obtained all at once.  I
>>> should have a new and improved version ready to go this weekend or early
>>> next week at the latest.
>>
>> Hi again!
>>
>> Yes, I agree that svn editor needs quite a bit of effort. I was actually
>> encouraged to break this challenge, and made my own svnup based on
>> svndiff. If you are interested in details, you may find it on github.com
>> under mkushnir/mrksvnup. It's a complete app, although you may use or
>> re-use (parts of) it if you want.
>>
>> I also tested your svnup more and found that it doesn't handle symbolic
>> links well. (May be you have already been aware of it.)
>>
>> I would suggest to test svnup against official svn client. Here is
>> briefly what I'm doing to test my own svnup:
>>
>> # svn co -r NNNNNN svn://svn.freebsd.org/base/head head.svn
>> # svnup -u svn://svn.freebsd.org/base/head -r NNNNNN -l head.svnup
>> # diff -r head.svnup/ head.svn | egrep -v 'FreeBSD|\-\-\-|^diff
>> \-r|^[0-9]+c[0-9]+'
>>
>> The diff output must be clean.
>>
>>
>> --
>> Markiyan.
>>
>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
>>> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
>>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to
>>> "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
>>
>




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?51581DA8.7040106>