Date: Sun, 2 May 2004 10:38:42 -0400 From: "Rita Lin" <ritalin@comcast.net> To: <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org> Subject: USB device driver question: timeout() and usbd_do_request() Message-ID: <004c01c43053$2a775920$9402a8c0@emachine>
index | next in thread | raw e-mail
Hello, I'm writing a USB driver for a device that does not have any interrupt. It only has Bulk-in and Bulk-out. A periodic polling status from default pipe is required to have a smooth data transfer. I used timeout() routine to call usbd_do_request() for polling. I thought maybe timeout() is called under interrupt context, since usbd_do_request() access system I/O, it crashes. However, by adding this timeout() in ucomstart(), it didn't crash until the third call to timeout(). Removing usbd_do_request() allows the timeout() to work without any problem. From the USB analyzer, I could see that even if the system crashed, a request was sent to the USB device correctly. There are two crashdump messages printed out to the screen, I could only catch the second one. The first one scrolled off the screen too fast. By counting the byte and the instruction pointer, the routine crashed in acquire_lock(). I 'greped' the kernel source code, didn't see this routine. I know I'm missing some important FreeBSD concept since I'm new to it, by reading related document did not reveal anything that might help me. If usbd_do_request() should never be used in timeout() as a callback routine, what other options do I have, to implement a status-polling scheme? Thank you very much in advance. Ritahelp
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?004c01c43053$2a775920$9402a8c0>