Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2005 16:02:48 -0700 (MST) From: Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com> To: gavin.atkinson@ury.york.ac.uk Cc: glebius@freebsd.org, freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: puc fails to attach serial ports Message-ID: <20051213.160248.74727585.imp@bsdimp.com> In-Reply-To: <1134485368.15730.95.camel@buffy.york.ac.uk> References: <20051212140446.GQ37414@FreeBSD.org> <1134481135.15730.76.camel@buffy.york.ac.uk> <1134485368.15730.95.camel@buffy.york.ac.uk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 2005-12-13 at 13:38 +0000, Gavin Atkinson wrote: > I don't understand why the DRIVER_METHOD(sio, puc, ...) is being ignored > in the puc-as-a-module case. Is this expected behaviour? Not being ignore, just not in the kernel. When you compile things statically, you compile them statically. You have to include puc and sio in the same kernel to get them both to work. *OR* you have to load puc and sio as modules. I do that all the time, and that works. Warner
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20051213.160248.74727585.imp>