Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2006 03:59:46 +0800 From: Xin LI <delphij@delphij.net> To: Pawel Jakub Dawidek <pjd@FreeBSD.org> Cc: freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.org, Mike Jakubik <mikej@rogers.com>, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-geom@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Journaling UFS with gjournal. Message-ID: <1150833586.24301.1.camel@spirit> In-Reply-To: <20060620193630.GA8007@garage.freebsd.pl> References: <20060619131101.GD1130@garage.freebsd.pl> <44984A91.8040805@rogers.com> <20060620193630.GA8007@garage.freebsd.pl>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[-- Attachment #1 --] 在 2006-06-20二的 21:36 +0200，Pawel Jakub Dawidek写道： > The performance impact is big for large files, because in theory we have > to write the data twice. > Yes, it eliminates need for SU, but there are reasons, that you still > want to use SU, eg. for snapshots. Em... IIRC SU and snapshots are independent, no? Cheers, -- Xin LI <delphij delphij net> http://www.delphij.net/ [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBEmFOyhcUczkLqiksRAvvIAKDL6Of+43Ocr7FgJWkvEyxAfDLl+QCgtAkb wQ02zSKSY4O94UM7Uu6F15M= =4olk -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1150833586.24301.1.camel>