Date: Wed, 10 Mar 1999 13:20:09 +0100 From: Dirk Froemberg <dirk@FreeBSD.org> To: Satoshi Asami <asami@FreeBSD.org> Cc: cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/Mk bsd.port.mk Message-ID: <19990310132008.A45509@physik.TU-Berlin.DE> In-Reply-To: <199903101058.CAA93238@silvia.hip.berkeley.edu>; from Satoshi Asami on Wed, Mar 10, 1999 at 02:58:06AM -0800 References: <199903091127.DAA22246@freefall.freebsd.org> <19990309234904.A35636@physik.TU-Berlin.DE> <199903092252.OAA91301@silvia.hip.berkeley.edu> <19990310115306.A43595@physik.TU-Berlin.DE> <199903101058.CAA93238@silvia.hip.berkeley.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi Satoshi! On Wed, Mar 10, 1999 at 02:58:06AM -0800, Satoshi Asami wrote: > * From: Dirk Froemberg <dirk@FreeBSD.org> > > * On Tue, Mar 09, 1999 at 02:52:57PM -0800, Satoshi Asami wrote: > > * > People need to get the upgrade kits if they want to use ports-current > * > for anything other than the latest -current or -stable. If there is > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > * > some documentation that suggests otherwise, please fix that. > > * At the moment there is no way to distinguish between 3.1-RELEASE and > * 3.1-STABLE via __FreeBSD_version. But we have to, since fetch behaves > * differently. > > No, ports-current is NOT supposed to work for 3.1R. (3.1R != "latest > -current | -stable") Ok, ok, ok! You are right! I take back what I said. I don't know why I didn't see that the 31upgrade kit has a fetch with -A flag in it. Perhaps it was a syncronisation problem with *.de.freebsd.org. Anyway, sorry for the false alarm... Regards Dirk -- e-mail: dirk@FreeBSD.ORG To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19990310132008.A45509>