Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2005 15:40:26 +0200 From: Peter Pentchev <roam@ringlet.net> To: Giorgos Keramidas <keramida@FreeBSD.org> Cc: freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: docs/30873: ``ip'' man page does not specify byte order for ip header with raw sockets Message-ID: <20050222134026.GE805@straylight.m.ringlet.net> In-Reply-To: <200502221333.j1MDXo0t086246@freefall.freebsd.org> References: <200502221333.j1MDXo0t086246@freefall.freebsd.org>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
[-- Attachment #1 --] On Tue, Feb 22, 2005 at 01:33:50PM +0000, Giorgos Keramidas wrote: > Synopsis: ``ip'' man page does not specify byte order for ip header with raw sockets > > State-Changed-From-To: patched->closed > State-Changed-By: keramida > State-Changed-When: Tue Feb 22 13:32:59 GMT 2005 > State-Changed-Why: > The RELENG_5 branch was created after this change was committed to HEAD. > This means that the change is already in 5-STABLE, so there is no need > to keep this PR open as "patched". What if Bruce meant to MFC it to RELENG_4, too, and then plain forgot? This PR would (okay, should have) served as a reminder to that effect... Yes, I know RELENG_5 is the official stable branch, but is it now our official Project policy that RELENG_4 is the official stale branch? :) G'luck, Peter -- Peter Pentchev roam@ringlet.net roam@cnsys.bg roam@FreeBSD.org PGP key: http://people.FreeBSD.org/~roam/roam.key.asc Key fingerprint FDBA FD79 C26F 3C51 C95E DF9E ED18 B68D 1619 4553 This inert sentence is my body, but my soul is alive, dancing in the sparks of your brain. [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFCGzZK7Ri2jRYZRVMRAtMjAKCv6YUGqsODEo/Z2vwxYTdFZMqqSwCgldjN 0Ts1WqNFveJYi8sqOd7vEew= =gYgD -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----help
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050222134026.GE805>