Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2002 20:44:49 -0500 (EST) From: Robert Watson <rwatson@FreeBSD.org> To: arch@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Status of lukemftpd? (was: cvs commit: src/etc inetd.conf (fwd)) Message-ID: <Pine.NEB.3.96L.1021029203816.96759C-100000@fledge.watson.org> In-Reply-To: <20021027021440.GB58312@dragon.nuxi.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, 26 Oct 2002, David O'Brien wrote: > On Thu, Oct 24, 2002 at 12:17:09PM -0400, Robert Watson wrote: > > Given that lukemftpd is highly feature incomplete with regards to the > > default ftpd, I'd like to propose at least the following: > > What "default" ftpd? We don't have one anymore. I consider it a HUGE > feature that lukemftpd doesn't do PAM. Like the new "standards" > headers, PAM has done nothing for me over what I had in pre-PAM'ized > FreeBSD, but cause great pain. Yet another promiss of something the > better and easier that has not turned out to be the case. > > Anyway, please do not do anything to lukemftpd until I return. David, Now that you're back from travel, do you have any plans to resolve the issues I've raised with lukemftpd? I've pointed at a number of problems (both large and small) and presumably we should try and make progress quickly so that the issues are resolved by 5.0-RELEASE. Robert N M Watson FreeBSD Core Team, TrustedBSD Projects robert@fledge.watson.org Network Associates Laboratories To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.NEB.3.96L.1021029203816.96759C-100000>