Date: Wed, 8 Dec 2021 11:08:38 +0300 From: Lev Serebryakov <lev@FreeBSD.org> To: Lutz Donnerhacke <lutz@donnerhacke.de> Cc: Neel Chauhan <nc@FreeBSD.org>, freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Porting OpenBSD MPLS to FreeBSD Message-ID: <5461c58c-bae8-8ee5-86f6-25c9de5030fe@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20211207142853.GB367@belenus.iks-jena.de> References: <7de5f4bf0fdec027b5ae5d844a7cb0f5@FreeBSD.org> <20211119201637.GA3334@belenus.iks-jena.de> <de072f28-76f2-848d-2677-1ab11251c874@FreeBSD.org> <20211207142853.GB367@belenus.iks-jena.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 07.12.2021 17:28, Lutz Donnerhacke wrote: >>> I'd prefer a netgraph approach, if possible. >>> It helps to concentrate on the important things. >> >> Isn't netgraph is very PPS-limited due to excessive logging? > > No. s/logging/locking/, I don't understand, what I've been thinking about to make such stupid mistake. > >> I thought, MPLS is carrier-grade stuff, and netgraph is very limited now. > > I do use netgraph for carrier-grade stuff. > Yes, ng_bridge was limited, but this is fixed. Doesn't it take separate lock for each packet passed though hook? I'm sure, it was true some time ago... -- // Lev Serebryakov
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?5461c58c-bae8-8ee5-86f6-25c9de5030fe>