Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 15 May 2000 11:44:28 -0700
From:      Alfred Perlstein <bright@wintelcom.net>
To:        Brett Glass <brett@lariat.org>
Cc:        Paul Hart <hart@iserver.com>, mike@minivend.com, security@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: (forw) Back door in Minivend
Message-ID:  <20000515114427.B249@fw.wintelcom.net>
In-Reply-To: <4.3.1.2.20000515115811.045e6690@localhost>; from brett@lariat.org on Mon, May 15, 2000 at 12:00:37PM -0600
References:  <4.3.1.2.20000515094342.045eb7e0@localhost> <Pine.BSF.4.21.0005150959110.23614-100000@anchovy.orem.iser ver.com> <4.3.1.2.20000515115811.045e6690@localhost>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
* Brett Glass <brett@lariat.org> [000515 11:38] wrote:
> At 10:04 AM 5/15/2000, Paul Hart wrote:
>    
> >On Mon, 15 May 2000, Brett Glass wrote:
> >
> > > According to Bruce Perens, the next version of the GPL will impose
> > > nasty conditions upon service providers and merchants who use GPLed
> > > code, such as requiring them to reveal all of their in-house additions
> > > to it even if they do not redistribute it.
> >
> >And how much FUD spinning is that?  SPIN IT BABY!!
> 
> It's not FUD; it is the absolute truth. I have the tape of the session
> at the February LinuxWorld in which Bruce said that -- emphatically.
> 
> One of these days, people will begin to get the idea that the GPL is
> not actually about freedom. It is, rather, a weapon of spite and an
> attempt to accumulate power and control.

I'm wondering about the following situation:

Let's say postgresql was GPL'd (someone suggested it recently),
now I have some custom mods to it that I use for the backend of
some e-commerce site that charges a fee for it's use, perhaps some
business to business application.

Shouldn't I be obligated to release my source (at least my modified
Postgresql source) because I'm selling the application which
incorperates a GPL'd program that I've modified even though it's
run over the web?  Doesn't that qualify as some sort of distribution
which would fall under the GPL's requirements that I distribute my
code?

Just wondering...

-- 
-Alfred Perlstein - [bright@wintelcom.net|alfred@freebsd.org]
"I have the heart of a child; I keep it in a jar on my desk."


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000515114427.B249>