Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2014 15:19:55 -0700 From: John-Mark Gurney <jmg@funkthat.com> To: Gleb Smirnoff <glebius@freebsd.org> Cc: svn-src-head@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r263091 - in head/sys: netinet netinet6 Message-ID: <20140312221955.GC32089@funkthat.com> In-Reply-To: <201403121429.s2CET8Hh038762@svn.freebsd.org> References: <201403121429.s2CET8Hh038762@svn.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Gleb Smirnoff wrote this message on Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 14:29 +0000: > Author: glebius > Date: Wed Mar 12 14:29:08 2014 > New Revision: 263091 > URL: http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/263091 > > Log: > Since both netinet/ and netinet6/ call into netipsec/ and netpfil/, > the protocol specific mbuf flags are shared between them. > > - Move all M_FOO definitions into a single place: netinet/in6.h, to > avoid future clashes. > - Resolve clash between M_DECRYPTED and M_SKIP_FIREWALL which resulted > in a failure of operation of IPSEC and packet filters. > > Thanks to Nicolas and Georgios for all the hard work on bisecting, > testing and finally finding the root of the problem. > > PR: kern/186755 > PR: kern/185876 > In collaboration with: Georgios Amanakis <gamanakis gmail.com> > In collaboration with: Nicolas DEFFAYET <nicolas-ml deffayet.com> > Sponsored by: Nginx, Inc. Was the version bumped so that old kernel modules won't cause issues w/ the new numbering? -- John-Mark Gurney Voice: +1 415 225 5579 "All that I will do, has been done, All that I have, has not."
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20140312221955.GC32089>