Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2021 23:51:30 +0000 From: Rick Macklem <rmacklem@uoguelph.ca> To: Dirk Meyer <dirk.meyer@dinoex.sub.org>, "current@freebsd.org" <current@freebsd.org>, "arch@freebsd.org" <arch@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: [HEADSUP] making /bin/sh the default shell for root Message-ID: <YQXPR0101MB0968B8FC9E40915A4CE41105DDA39@YQXPR0101MB0968.CANPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> In-Reply-To: <IjYPwc4%2BEg@dmeyer.dinoex.sub.org> References: <20210922083645.4vnoajyvwq6wfhdf@aniel.nours.eu> <IjYPwc4%2BEg@dmeyer.dinoex.sub.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Dirk Meyer wrote:=0A= >Baptiste Daroussin schrieb:,=0A= [stuff snipped]=0A= >=0A= >We have already "toor" for sh.=0A= As an aside, I will note that having multiple passwd entries for the same u= id somewhat=0A= breaks the mapping done by nfsuserd(8), since it will map the uid to one of= the names.=0A= =0A= It is not a big issue, but in my perfect world, there would not be "toor".= =0A= =0A= I don't have an opinion on what shell root should use.=0A= =0A= rick=0A= =0A= I disgree on the "user friendly" part of sh.=0A= History search in sh and bash can't hold a candle angainst csh.=0A= =0A= Migration of aliase will be painful as ">&" and "|&" is not supoported.=0A= =0A= I vote strongly against it.=0A= =0A= kind regards Dirk=0A= =0A= - Dirk Meyer, Im Grund 4, 34317 Habichtswald, Germany=0A= - [dirk.meyer@dinoex.sub.org],[dirk.meyer@guug.de],[dinoex@FreeBSD.org]=0A= =0A= =0A=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?YQXPR0101MB0968B8FC9E40915A4CE41105DDA39>