Date: Thu, 29 May 1997 15:06:38 +0100 From: Brian Somers <brian@utell.co.uk> To: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com> Cc: Brian Somers <brian@awfulhak.org>, freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: rstartd on freefall Message-ID: <199705291406.PAA03949@utell.co.uk> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 28 May 1997 21:39:59 PDT." <25691.864880799@time.cdrom.com>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
> > So rstart is broken by design. Let me guess. This has been argued
> > before, and the xfree86 guys won't allow an absolute path to rstartd
> > (via say a flag to rstart).... :|
>
> I don't recall that it was ever discussed. I've certainly never heard
> of anyone actually using it, at least not until just now. :-)
Heh. This is a good example of me wandering around and trying to
figure out how something works. I come up with a solution and
*assume* it's the one everyone else uses 'cos it works.
How do other people exec remote X programs ? Doing a "rsh ....."
doesn't send your DISPLAY over, so you end up with some nasty lines
like:
rsh freefall xterm -display $HOSTDISPLAY -T freefall -n freefall -e bash
--login
rather than
rstart -g freefall xterm
(although I suppose you could hide the -T & -n in .Xdefaults).
The rstart idea is nice 'cos you can just dump your .rstart.* directories
on a machine and kill all the long lines :)
> Jordan
--
Brian <brian@awfulhak.org> <brian@freebsd.org>
<http://www.awfulhak.org>;
Don't _EVER_ lose your sense of humour !
help
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199705291406.PAA03949>