Date: Fri, 8 Jul 2016 09:54:23 +0200 From: Michael Schuster <michaelsprivate@gmail.com> To: Bernt Hansson <bah@bananmonarki.se> Cc: =?UTF-8?B?SsO4cm4gw4VuZQ==?= <freebsd@jornane.me>, freeBSD Mailing List <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Found possible bug - how to report Message-ID: <CADqw_g%2B%2BQc%2BvoJ_EtD0g-nJQSByfg_EWmxCy2YFCB2enMecTpA@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <fb49a183-0012-9297-c5d5-5de90de20c53@bananmonarki.se> References: <8b3948f8-dc6a-af53-4ff5-b73be90884d5@fyrkat.no> <f84f60ff-0cb8-99eb-c78e-57586cd4af20@bananmonarki.se> <CADqw_gJdoLdwayyq3HzWUJq0vTDFQcAik%2BooVLRyf0=iT8VNCw@mail.gmail.com> <fb49a183-0012-9297-c5d5-5de90de20c53@bananmonarki.se>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Jul 8, 2016 at 9:47 AM, Bernt Hansson <bah@bananmonarki.se> wrote: > On 2016-07-08 09:04, Michael Schuster wrote: > >> On Fri, Jul 8, 2016 at 8:58 AM, Bernt Hansson <bah@bananmonarki.se> >> wrote: >> >> Csh and tcsh are both sh based. >>> >> >> that's a rather surprising statement. Can you support it? (It goes against >> most I ever heard about csh - I was under the impression that Bill Joy >> wrote csh while at university because he was fed up with how sh worked, >> but >> that may be wrong [too?]). >> >> Michael >> > Well you supported it yourself. > > can you elaborate? I thought I actually did exactly the opposite ... ETOOLITTLECOFFEE? cheers Michael -- Michael Schuster http://recursiveramblings.wordpress.com/ recursion, n: see 'recursion'
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CADqw_g%2B%2BQc%2BvoJ_EtD0g-nJQSByfg_EWmxCy2YFCB2enMecTpA>