Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2005 12:13:39 -0400 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> To: Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav <des@des.no> Cc: Divacky Roman <xdivac02@stud.fit.vutbr.cz>, current@freebsd.org, Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH]: fdalloc optimization Message-ID: <20050822161339.GA13907@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <868xyu3wln.fsf@xps.des.no> References: <20050821084546.GA77111@stud.fit.vutbr.cz> <20050821175406.GA36164@xor.obsecurity.org> <868xyu3wln.fsf@xps.des.no>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
[-- Attachment #1 --] On Mon, Aug 22, 2005 at 03:55:00PM +0200, Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav wrote: > Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> writes: > > On Sun, Aug 21, 2005 at 10:45:46AM +0200, Divacky Roman wrote: > > > I made a patch for fdalloc which could speed it up a bit, its stored under > > > kern/85176 or http://hysteria.sk/~neologism/kern_descrip.patch > > That's all nice and everything, but *does* it speed it up a bit? :-) > > It won't make a measurable difference, but that doesn't mean the patch > is wrong. Just that it's not an optimization, as it was advertised :) As Poul-Henning said, if you can't measure a performance difference either way then sell it some other way. Kris [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFDCfmzWry0BWjoQKURAoxeAJ0cnYHeGNzRrDaauZu1zDBl+nAMMwCguc5e hKen+dRg7OynUWrnxmbPmzM= =SqWp -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----help
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050822161339.GA13907>