Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2003 16:45:35 -0800 From: Scott Reese <sreese@codysbooks.com> To: Lucas Holt <luke@foolishgames.com> Cc: freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Tomcat 4.1.18, Apache 1.3.27 and jk? Message-ID: <3E5EB12F.40403@codysbooks.com> References: <90D7C354-4AA6-11D7-BD46-0030656DD690@foolishgames.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
So, are you saying that mod_jk from ports works for Tomcat 4.1.18 even though it's only intended for 3? The ports collection does have a Tomcat 4.1.18 port (www/jakarta-tomcat41) and I definitely agree that a mod_jk2 port needs to happen. If I knew anything about making ports, I might be inclined to give it a shot myself, but I haven't the slightest idea how to go about making that happen. -Scott Lucas Holt wrote: > First, Tomcat 4.1.18 and Apache 1.3.27 do play nicely on FreeBSD (4.7 > Release). I am currently running Tomcat on Java 1.31 (native) P8. I > ended up installing the 3.x release of tomcat through the ports > collection and mod_jk. I then installed tomcat 4.1.18 myself and > adjusted my apache config to use it. I deleted tomcat 3. > > The ports collection NEEDS Tomcat 4.1.18 AND more importantly mod_jk2. > Someone from the apache group sent out an email over a month ago about > the fact that no one has submitted a mod_jk2 module compiled to them. > > I tried to compile mod_jk2 for freebsd first. I had apache 2 setup and > running perfectly and then had to downgrade. There were problems with > the threading libraries playing nicely with it as I recall. When I > finally got it to compile, apache would crash when i tried to load it > giving me all sorts of errors. > > On Thursday, February 27, 2003, at 03:56 PM, Scott Reese wrote: > >> [Please cc: me in any replies as I am not currently subbed to this >> list. Thank you.] >> >> Hello, >> >> My ISP is going to be upgrading our server within the next few weeks >> and we also wanted to upgrade Tomcat to version 4.1.18. There is one >> small problem with this, however. There is currently no port of jk or >> jk2 that will allow us to let Tomcat 4 and Apache play together. >> mod_webapp is not really an option because that is only for Apache 2 >> and (according to the Tomcat docs) is a poor substitute for jk. I >> know there is a lot of interest in something like this as I've found >> numerous other instances of people asking my same question, but there >> seems to be no answer currently. In light of this, I was wondering if >> there were plans to make a port of jk or jk2 for Tomcat 4 so that we >> may take advantage of the newer features and better perfomance of >> Tomcat 4. Or, if no plans are in the works, does anyone have a >> working set up where Apache 1.3.27 and Tomcat 4.1.18 are working >> together as they should? If so, I'd be very interested in hearing >> about how this was accomplished. >> >> Thank you, >> Scott >> >> >> To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org >> with "unsubscribe freebsd-java" in the body of the message >> >> > > Lucas Holt > Luke@FoolishGames.com > ________________________________________________________ > FoolishGames.com > JustJournal.com > > Prayer is the greatest > swiftest > ship my heart could sail upon > > -- Jewel Kilcher, A Night Without Armor > > > > -- Scott Reese phone: (510) 845-1609 Cody's Books fax: (510) 845-0484 Web Development/ email: sreese@codysbooks.com Technical Support http://www.codysbooks.com PGP Key Fingerprint: EB86 9EFD 52B2 371D BA73 8EEB 9A00 AF5C C420 400F To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-java" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3E5EB12F.40403>