Date: Sat, 29 Dec 2007 16:06:39 +0300 From: Dmitry Marakasov <amdmi3@amdmi3.ru> To: Warner Losh <imp@FreeBSD.org> Cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org, src-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/kern vfs_bio.c vfs_mount.c Message-ID: <20071229130639.GA82286@hades.panopticon> In-Reply-To: <200712271638.lBRGcTu9071266@repoman.freebsd.org> References: <200712271638.lBRGcTu9071266@repoman.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
* Warner Losh (imp@FreeBSD.org) wrote: > A partial solution to some of the 'pull the umass device with a > mounted FS' problems. These are more along the lines of 'avoiding an > avoidable panic' than a complete solution to removable devices. We > now close the barn door after the horse has gotten lose and has been > hit by a truck, as it were. The barn no longer catches fire in this > case, but the horse is still dead :-). Cool, but won't that affect hard drives too? I mean when my hdd drive goes offline, what I want is panic, to prevent possible [more] data loss. If this commit affects anything besides removeable devices, my opinion is this behavior should be reconsidered, or at least made tunable. Or am I missing something? -- Dmitry A. Marakasov | jabber: amdmi3@jabber.ru amdmi3@amdmi3.ru | http://www.amdmi3.ru
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20071229130639.GA82286>