Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2014 07:14:40 +0400 From: Gleb Smirnoff <glebius@FreeBSD.org> To: John-Mark Gurney <jmg@funkthat.com> Cc: svn-src-head@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r263091 - in head/sys: netinet netinet6 Message-ID: <20140313031440.GR80022@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20140312221955.GC32089@funkthat.com> References: <201403121429.s2CET8Hh038762@svn.freebsd.org> <20140312221955.GC32089@funkthat.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 03:19:55PM -0700, John-Mark Gurney wrote: J> > Log: J> > Since both netinet/ and netinet6/ call into netipsec/ and netpfil/, J> > the protocol specific mbuf flags are shared between them. J> > J> > - Move all M_FOO definitions into a single place: netinet/in6.h, to J> > avoid future clashes. J> > - Resolve clash between M_DECRYPTED and M_SKIP_FIREWALL which resulted J> > in a failure of operation of IPSEC and packet filters. J> > J> > Thanks to Nicolas and Georgios for all the hard work on bisecting, J> > testing and finally finding the root of the problem. J> > J> > PR: kern/186755 J> > PR: kern/185876 J> > In collaboration with: Georgios Amanakis <gamanakis gmail.com> J> > In collaboration with: Nicolas DEFFAYET <nicolas-ml deffayet.com> J> > Sponsored by: Nginx, Inc. J> J> Was the version bumped so that old kernel modules won't cause issues w/ J> the new numbering? You are probably right. But since I'm going to checkin another ABI breaker soon, we will piggyback on that bump. -- Totus tuus, Glebius.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20140313031440.GR80022>