Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2004 09:36:02 +1300 From: Jonathan Chen <jonc@chen.org.nz> To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ant script annoyances Message-ID: <20040105203602.GB5706@grimoire.chen.org.nz> In-Reply-To: <20040105174125.GB732@andouillette.esil.univ-mrs.fr> References: <20030909215210.GA5404@grimoire.chen.org.nz> <20040105174125.GB732@andouillette.esil.univ-mrs.fr>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Jan 05, 2004 at 06:41:25PM +0100, Herve Quiroz wrote: > Hi all! > > I'm back from holyday and after a look at my personal TODO list I found > this issue still opened. Many things have been said on the subject and I > remember we came quite close to a solution. Unfortunately nothing has > been done yet. So I will read this thread again and see if we did agree > on some point in which case I will code it... unless Ernst already > modified apache-ant BSD run script in port version 1.6.0. The apache-ant script is still the same (I still delete the lines off my local /usr/local/bin/ant). My recollection of the thread was that a few of you wanted to keep the original functionality and wanted the option to switch between the vanilla-ant and freebsd-enhanced-ant. My personal preference to is to have a "USE_FREEBSD_EXTENSIONS=no" in the Makefile of the port, where the installer can redefine to "yes" if they wish to use the FreeBSD-enhanced version. It's better to have just one standard (one way or the other) version installed on a box than to have too many features put into what should be just a simple wrapper script. Cheers. -- Jonathan Chen <jonc@chen.org.nz> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- If you're right 90% of the time, why quibble about the remaining 3%?
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040105203602.GB5706>