Date: Thu, 19 May 2005 13:27:23 -0400 From: Jung-uk Kim <jkim@niksun.com> To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org, obrien@freebsd.org Cc: Pav Lucistnik <pav@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: FreeBSD on dual core Opterons - stupid buildworld test Message-ID: <200505191327.23295.jkim@niksun.com> In-Reply-To: <20050519010828.GA64608@dragon.NUXI.org> References: <428B6FC1.3000907@fsn.hu> <20050518180521.GB9719@odin.ac.hmc.edu> <20050519010828.GA64608@dragon.NUXI.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wednesday 18 May 2005 09:08 pm, David O'Brien wrote: > On Wed, May 18, 2005 at 11:05:21AM -0700, Brooks Davis wrote: > > On Wed, May 18, 2005 at 07:29:00PM +0200, Pav Lucistnik wrote: > > > Attila Nagy pí?e v st 18. 05. 2005 v 18:39 +0200: > > > > Hello, > > > > > > > > I did some buildworld tests on an HP BL45p with 4 2,2 GHz > > > > Opterons. > > > > > > > > Sequential time make buildworld -jX times (if there is a > > > > missing iteration, then the build has failed): > > > > > > > > http://people.fsn.hu/~bra/bl45p/dmesg.boot > > > > > > > > Hyperthreading: 2 logical CPUs > > > > > > So dual-core Opterons report into system as Hyperthreading? > > > Uncool. > > > > What the AMD reps said at a session I attended last year is that > > they report as supporting hyper threading, but set another bit to > > say that they are actually real cores. We probably need to find > > out what that bit is. > > I'm taking care of this. Please no one commit any AMD Dual-core > related patches (especially WRT HTT) with out passing them by me. Okay, feel free to ignore/reuse my patch, then. Jung-uk Kim > thanks, > -- > -- David (obrien@FreeBSD.org)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200505191327.23295.jkim>