Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 3 Sep 1996 07:06:34 -0600 (MDT)
From:      Stephen Fisher <lithium@cia-g.com>
To:        Joe Lee <joelee@col.com.hk>
Cc:        isp@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: is subnet #0 available for use?
Message-ID:  <Pine.BSF.3.91.960903070452.4950A-100000@gallup.cia-g.com>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.OSF.3.93.960903114803.700B-100000@saturn.col.com.hk>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

A while back you couldn't use the first and last subnets ever.  Most 
people still say you shouldn't - which is a large waste.  However, most 
routers today let you use the first (#0) subnet and last just fine.

On Tue, 3 Sep 1996, Joe Lee wrote:

> 
> i've asked this question in newsgroup but without any definite response.
> so here is the question:
> 
> i once read an article about subnetting which stated that subnet #0 is
> available for use. this seems violate ip standards, however, i want to
> know if this is possible (short of ip addresses) and where can i get 
> further info.
> 



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.91.960903070452.4950A-100000>