Date: 08 Oct 1998 23:43:03 +0200 From: dag-erli@ifi.uio.no (Dag-Erling C. =?iso-8859-1?Q?Sm=F8rgrav?= ) To: Marc Slemko <marcs@znep.com> Cc: freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: PC Magazine 10/20/1998 Article about FreeBSD Message-ID: <xzpsogybuhk.fsf@hrotti.ifi.uio.no> In-Reply-To: Marc Slemko's message of "Thu, 8 Oct 1998 14:15:04 -0700 (PDT)" References: <Pine.GSO.4.02A.9810081355340.15278-100000@redfish>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Marc Slemko <marcs@znep.com> writes: > If a machine has enough memory to keep most (for certain definitions of > most) of the working set of the static benchmark content in memory, then > IIS and NT do have an advantage over FreeBSD and Apache (both the OS and > the webserver) due to various optimizations. Well, until NT crashes. Reminds me of the time when (five or six years ago) a norwegian computer manufactor which shall remain unnamed turned in one of their newest "home computing" models to PC World Norway for benchmarking. The computer they sent in had a caching IDE controller with 16 MB of cache, which at that time represented twice the amount of RAM (and one-eighth the amount of disk space) in an average home PC... DES -- Dag-Erling Smørgrav - dag-erli@ifi.uio.no To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?xzpsogybuhk.fsf>