Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2004 10:43:59 -0400 (EDT) From: Kenneth W Cochran <kwc@TheWorld.com> To: Ken Smith <kensmith@cse.Buffalo.EDU> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 4.10-BETA named (not) starting Message-ID: <200404151443.KAA815121@shell.TheWorld.com> References: <200404151317.JAA827152@shell.TheWorld.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2004 10:09:38 -0400 >From: Ken Smith <kensmith@cse.Buffalo.EDU> >To: Kenneth W Cochran <kwc@theworld.com> >Subject: Re: 4.10-BETA named (not) starting > >On Thu, Apr 15, 2004 at 09:17:09AM -0400, Kenneth W Cochran wrote: >> I just updated to -stable as of 2004/04/14 and named is not >> starting at bootup. >> >> >From /var/log/messages: >> >> Apr 15 07:38:14 <console.info> localhost /kernel: can't open '/etc/namedb/named.conf' >> >> But, if I become root & type "ndc start", named starts & >> seems to run as before. >> >> Any idea(s) what's happening here and/or how to fix? > >Just checking. Did you run 'mergemaster' as part of the upgrade? Yes; named config appeared to be unaffected. It would appear the the "can't open" message is a permission problem of some kind, but from the *kernel*? And that file is root:wheel 644. As mentioned, ndc saw it & started named just fine. Strange... -kc
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200404151443.KAA815121>