Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2020 17:43:13 +0300 From: Slawa Olhovchenkov <slw@zxy.spb.ru> To: Ben Woods <woodsb02@gmail.com> Cc: mike@karels.net, Conrad Meyer <cem@freebsd.org>, freebsd-arch@freebsd.org, Ed Maste <emaste@freebsd.org>, Philip Paeps <philip@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: svn commit: r356758 - in head/usr.sbin/bsdinstall: . scripts Message-ID: <20200123144313.GM38096@zxy.spb.ru> In-Reply-To: <CAOc73CDhPsUkt6aJLSua=9OG5gh_z52qRV0GGMtNaX2=n_5WmQ@mail.gmail.com> References: <CAOc73CB75Szqt95fNcks3x%2BRBEZYGA4eUCBHWa39GMha6enOuA@mail.gmail.com> <202001180116.00I1G705020955@mail.karels.net> <CAOc73CDhPsUkt6aJLSua=9OG5gh_z52qRV0GGMtNaX2=n_5WmQ@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Jan 23, 2020 at 08:06:59AM +0800, Ben Woods wrote: > Hi everyone, > > Before I commit phabricator review D23224, is there any final comments? > > Particularly on these 2 lines of help-text: > msg_partitioning_zfs_help="ZFS is recommended if you have at least 4GB RAM" > msg_partitioning_ufs_help="UFS is recommended if you have less than 4GB of > RAM" > > There is some disagree about what these 2 recommendations should be. > > 4GB was recommended by: imp, emaste, philip, eugen, dteske > 8GB was recommended by: mike > 16GB was recommended by: cem > > The 4GB limit seems to have the best consensus, however there was some > debate about whether ZFS is recommended on a system with 4GB, or only > systems with MORE THAN 4GB. > > As for the ZFS auto-tuning, I see that as being a separate discussion > (which could ultimately change this recommendation, but shouldn't prevent > us from committing this help text now). May experience: ZFS recomended for 1GB and above.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20200123144313.GM38096>