Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 21:57:14 +0300 From: Esa Karkkainen <ejk@iki.fi> To: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Reproducable, possibly NFS related, fatal double fault in 6.2-R-p7 Message-ID: <20071016185714.GB2186@pp.htv.fi> In-Reply-To: <20071016004637.GA79351@cdnetworks.co.kr> References: <20071004165755.GA1049@pp.htv.fi> <47120D83.1010703@FreeBSD.org> <20071015203202.GA17964@pp.htv.fi> <20071016004637.GA79351@cdnetworks.co.kr>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Oct 16, 2007 at 09:46:37AM +0900, Pyun YongHyeon wrote:
> I remember that nve(4) is NOT stable under heavy network loads.
Yup, that seems to correct. Usually this machine, ie. home my
orkstation, does not have a load, network wise or in general.
> I'd like to say use nfe(4) which is believed to be more stable/fast
> than nve(4). nfe(4) is also default NVIDIA NIC driver for
> CURRENT/RELENG_7. If you have to use RELENG_6 try nfe(4) at the
> following URL.
Well, I could use -CURRENT or RELENG_7 in this machine, but I made a
decision some time a go to use RELENG_6_2, because it's hassle free.
--
"In the beginning the Universe was created. This has made a lot of
people very angry and been widely regarded as a bad move."
-- Douglas Adams 1952 - 2001
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20071016185714.GB2186>