Date: Tue, 30 Nov 1999 09:18:50 +0000 (GMT) From: Doug Rabson <dfr@nlsystems.com> To: tanimura@r.dl.itc.u-tokyo.ac.jp Cc: peter@netplex.com.au, winter@jurai.net, hibma@skylink.it, current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: sbc and pcm Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.10.9911300918060.325-100000@salmon.nlsystems.com> In-Reply-To: <14403.12747.511556.68187Y@rina.r.dl.itc.u-tokyo.ac.jp>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 30 Nov 1999 tanimura@r.dl.itc.u-tokyo.ac.jp wrote: > On Tue, 23 Nov 1999 04:22:39 +0800, > Peter Wemm <peter@netplex.com.au> said: > > >> Mostly, sbc.c is handling PnP ID matching in a totally bogus manner. > > Peter> Yes, it's quite bogus and is incompatible with motherboard devices. There > Peter> should be no vendor ID references in there at all, that's for card ID, not > Peter> device id. > > I am now working to tidy up the sbc probe. Would it be enough for the > sound chips on motherboards to check the logical device ID of 0x??008c0e? > > How does the result of pnpinfo(1) for a motherboard chip look like? I think a lot of motherboard chips don't show up at all and are only detected using PNPBIOS. Unfortunately, there is no userland tool for querying pnpbios. -- Doug Rabson Mail: dfr@nlsystems.com Nonlinear Systems Ltd. Phone: +44 181 442 9037 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.10.9911300918060.325-100000>