Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2001 03:05:10 +0100 From: Andrew Boothman <andrew.boothman@blueyonder.co.uk> To: "Jonathan Fortin" <jfortin@akalink.com> Cc: chat@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Sysadmin Article --Which OS is Fastest for High-Performance Network Applications? Message-ID: <5.1.0.14.0.20010615030432.00a04570@127.0.0.1> In-Reply-To: <00e901c0f43a$9aced2a0$13a86395@alink> References: <SAK.2001.06.13.okngmgad@support10>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hmmm. If that's a case then I don't think we should let this slide. I would say that an email to aankerholz@cmp.com (The Editor-In-Chief) is in order. This is supposedly their 'featured article' this week, we can't really let their whole readership come away with that impression of FreeBSD's performance. At 02:56 PM 13/06/01 -0400, you wrote: >This is an example of a biased OS comparison chart > >It is a joke, My freebsd system can do more then 10,000 files in 200 secds, >In fact, it can do it under 30 seconds. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?5.1.0.14.0.20010615030432.00a04570>