Date: Tue, 14 Sep 1999 15:11:30 -0500 From: Jonathan Lemon <jlemon@americantv.com> To: Brett Glass <brett@lariat.org> Cc: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@zippy.cdrom.com>, chat@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: FreeBSD Distributions: Leveling the playing field Message-ID: <19990914151130.32047@right.PCS> In-Reply-To: <4.2.0.58.19990914140446.04b44100@localhost>; from Brett Glass on Sep 09, 1999 at 02:06:24PM -0600 References: <Your <4.2.0.58.19990914122930.04ad8c20@localhost> <4.2.0.58.19990914140446.04b44100@localhost>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sep 09, 1999 at 02:06:24PM -0600, Brett Glass wrote: > At 12:35 PM 9/14/99 -0700, Jordan K. Hubbard wrote: > > >> It is very likely that many things which were done as part of that > > > distribution would be contributed. But this should not be a requirement. > > > >As long as the component itself was not a requirement to installing > >the product, I'd agree. If you make your hypothetical new installer a > >requirement and now all the users of "FreeBSD HyperBrett" are going > >through a substantially different installation experience and posting > >emails to -questions which say things like "I'm at the default smell > >configuration menu and I can't decide between (M)usty library and > >(D)amp basement, has anyone tried these two smells yet?", well, the > >people who staff those lists are going to be exceedingly confused. > > How about if the user is given the option of which installer to use? > Use of the new installer would not be a requirement but rather a third- > party option, and clearly labeled as such. Would this work? Or maybe the establishment of a slightly diluted name would suffice to insure that it is different from the FreeBSD Project? E.g: Lariat/fbsd? -- Jonathan To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19990914151130.32047>