Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2003 09:44:11 +0100 (CET) From: =?iso-8859-1?q?Claus=20Guttesen?= <cguttesen@yahoo.dk> To: Jeff Roberson <jroberson@chesapeake.net>, current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ULE and current. Message-ID: <20031208084411.26960.qmail@web14102.mail.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <20031207082612.D4201-100000@mail.chesapeake.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi. > more feedback from current users. The only big > change I have in the > pipeline for ULE is improved HTT support. This has > all been coded and > multiuser systems with lots > of interactive tasks. If anyone has such a system, > I would love to hear > of feedback while running ULE. For anyone else, if > your workload is I'm running ULE on 1 out of 6 web-servers. This is running current as of Nov. 19'th. I havent't noticed any difference in behaviour compared to the other five servers. It varies from 100 % idle to 0 %, runs quite smothly. NFS behaves nice. The other servers are all using the old BSD-scheduler and are mainly running 5.1 frozen branch. All are dual Xeons at either 2.4 or 3 Ghz. My workstation with dual pentium III @ 1 ghz goes ULE as well. Except while unpacking big files, the scheduler is behaving alot better compared to two-three months ago. regards Claus Yahoo! Mail (http://dk.mail.yahoo.com) - Gratis: 6 MB lagerplads, spamfilter og virusscan
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20031208084411.26960.qmail>